Skip to content
Menu
Paul Casey
  • Curation Policy
Paul Casey
The UK Is Racing to Build the World’s First Commercial Fusion Power Plant

The UK Is Racing to Build the World’s First Commercial Fusion Power Plant

Posted on November 20, 2019


We’re struggling to figure out what the future of sustainable energy looks like on our planet, and there are a lot of different directions we could go. The UK, however, made a bold move when they recently announced a huge investment in a prototype fusion power facility that could be functioning as a commercial power plant by 2040! That’s pretty mind blowing for many reasons, one of which is that fusion power isn’t really a reality yet. See, nuclear fusion is what powers stars, including our Sun. And the ‘fusion’ part refers to the fact that isotopes of extremely light elements like hydrogen, are fusing together at the extremely high temperatures and pressures that exist at the center of stars. Under these conditions, gases like helium and hydrogen actually exist as plasmas. For a fusion interaction to occur, the nuclei of the atoms that are being joined have to undergo a change in the way they’re put together. We take those two isotopes, usually heavy hydrogen isotopes like deuterium and tritium, and expose them to really extreme conditions. What comes out on the other side of that really hot, dense party is a rearrangement of their component parts: helium atoms, neutrons and a HUGE amount of energy. So how the heck do we recreate what happens inside of stars…here on Earth? Well, you have to try and replicate those extreme conditions so that you can get the atoms to behave the way you want them to. That involves creating plasmas, or taking gases to very high temperatures and densities which a number of innovative facilities do in a variety of ways. One of these facilities is called Iter, which means ‘the way’ in Latin and is a major international fusion collaboration that’s been in progress since 1985. China, the EU, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and the U.S. are all contributing members who have agreed to fund ITER’s goal of producing fusion energy that could power our world Because if we could make it work the way we hope to? Fusion energy could provide us with clean, basically limitless energy. And the U.K. government just dedicated 220 million pounds for a facility of their own. So the race is very much on, as it has been for several decades. Because as amazing as the idea of fusion energy is, we still haven’t reached a point where the amount of energy produced by the fusion reaction is greater than the amount of energy it takes to create the interaction in the first place. Until we’re able to make that happen, it doesn’t really make sense to think about fusion energy as a commercial option. This U.K. prototype fusion facility is called the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production, or STEP. And the first step toward making STEP a reality is to come up with the design for the plant. Then—if the project gets approved to move forward—actually building the spec power plant would cost somewhere on the order of billions of pounds. STEP is hoping to make breakthroughs in the field by pursuing a slightly different approach from Iter— specifically, a different kind of tokamak. A tokamak is a common design for the central machine of a potential magnetic fusion reactor, where the plasma is created and where the fusion takes place. The newly proposed U.K. facility will use a smaller, more spherical tokamak which they hope will be cheaper. Iter’s long-standing plans incorporate a larger donut-shaped tokamak, a design which has been more extensively studied. So on the one hand, STEP’s innovation presents a risk, but it also presents an opportunity to potentially improve energy yield and on a smaller initial budget. It’s definitely interesting that the UK is announcing their plans for this extremely ambitious project just as it faces uncertainty around the Brexit decision… and therefore its involvement with Iter. Because remember, the EU is one of Iter’s contributing members, so if the U.K. leaves the EU… then they’re on their own for fusion innovation. But they’re not alone in branching out— each of the seven Iter partners are exploring commercial reactors on their own as well. With all of these efforts, plus the ongoing international collaboration of Iter, the hope is to make fusion energy a reality sooner, rather than later. 2040 seems like an ambitious goal, but I think it’s going to take that kind of audacity to get us where we need to go… and in the process, make the future of humanity on this planet more sustainable and honestly, possible. If you want to see how close we are to fusion energy, check out this video here, and let us know what other futuristic energy developments you want us to cover down in the comments below. Subscribe to Seeker for all your energy tech news, and thanks for watching! I’ll see you next time.

Related posts:

  1. The Race to the Moon’s South Pole Is On, But Who Will Get There First?
  2. Mines Athletics: Joe Popp
  3. Is Racewalking a Sport?
  4. Discovery Channel – Large Asteroid Impact Simulation

100 thoughts on “The UK Is Racing to Build the World’s First Commercial Fusion Power Plant”

  1. Seeker says:
    November 20, 2019 at 2:54 pm

    Hi Seekers, thanks for watching! Want more on fusion energy? Check out this episode of How Close Are We?: https://youtu.be/ZW_YCWLyv6A

    Reply
  2. Mike Harrington says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:38 pm

    Hmmmmmm donuts! (Homer)

    Reply
  3. Răzvan Botea says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:39 pm

    why is this so great? since ITER (France) is scheduled to be operational in the early 2030s to mid 2030s, it's way ahead of UK's plans.

    Reply
  4. Shuvam Dam says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:45 pm

    They wouldn't have to built it on their own if they were a part of the eu. But probably it will lead to more jobs in uk and a different approach improves the chances of making fusion power become a reality

    Reply
  5. SthamerAMVs says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:50 pm

    I’m from the UK and I study physics and want to get into this field, it’s super exciting to think the UK might be on the forefront of something like this

    Reply
  6. off stage says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:52 pm

    How dare you. You know nothing of brexit and what we will or won't be able to do. Also it's not if we leave it's when. We will be free

    Reply
  7. Cringerbread Kooky says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:57 pm

    No no no, you guys got it all wrong. Either get the earrings or do the dance. That's how fusion has and always will work

    Reply
  8. maximosh says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:57 pm

    These reactors are not by any means 'power plants'. Again just huge experiments with zero power transmission capability. A lot of power goes in.. nothing comes out!

    Reply
  9. Mariano Alippi says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:57 pm

    Greace of love, a fysical fushion a sustantiable one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oKPYe53h78

    Reply
  10. Cringerbread Kooky says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:58 pm

    Fusion? ha!

    Reply
  11. Cringerbread Kooky says:
    November 20, 2019 at 4:59 pm

    Yeah but what's the scouter say?

    Reply
  12. Shujath Hussain says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:01 pm

    after BREXIT then want FUXIT?

    Reply
  13. Alex Dunkel says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:10 pm

    Sustainable energy will never exists if civilization's vision is unsustainable. Continual, exponential growth and the economies that rely on it need to be replaced with flat growth. And that will require an egalitarian social structure, not one ruled by wealthy elites. And that will require understanding why our 3-tiered social system evolved in the first place, not by passing tax laws and regulations.

    And of course none of this can happen if we continue to viscerally believe civilization's key myths:

    1) The world was made for us.
    2) We were made to rule the world.
    3) There is only one right way to live.
    4) Humans are flawed.

    Instead, everyone needs to understand that:

    1) We are a part of everything, not above it.
    2) There is no single right way to live.
    3) Humans are not flawed.

    Anything less than this and we will be removed from this planet in the not too distant future. (That's what unsustainable means.)

    Fusion power sounds good, but stop talking about it as a fix for a larger problem when instead the thinking behind it is rooted in the core problems.

    Reply
  14. looopy2u says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:15 pm

    Fat but firm

    Reply
  15. JStock14 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:17 pm

    Maren Hunsberger should host a video about the science of burgers while slowly eating a burger.. 🙈😂

    Reply
  16. Dissonance Paradiddle says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:21 pm

    If you put a catalytic muon fusion reactor in low Earth orbit you'd have all the muons you'd need and could then beam power down to the surface

    Reply
  17. Erikas L. says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:23 pm

    1:32 so its called "de wae" seems like Uganda is sponcoring this😏

    Reply
  18. Lost and Found - The Face of America Abroad says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:25 pm

    These are such paltry investment numbers for something that the entire planet depends on.
    Ford threw a quick $600,000,000 at Rivian.
    Lockheed was just given $3,300,000,000 to manage a satellite communications network for ten years.
    Raytheon was just awarded a $5,000,000,000 contract to upgrade the Patriot missile radar system.
    And, these are really just recent, everyday contracts that I picked off of the Seeking Alpha ticker.
    So, when I hear that a country or countries refuse to put the billions anywhere that isn't designed to kill, I'm not impressed.

    Reply
  19. hellcat1988 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:27 pm

    I suppose it's PURELY coincidence that the rendering looks a lot like the ark reactor from Iron Man.

    Reply
  20. Dr. SICK says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:27 pm

    "Wait before Elon Musk shoot his fusion rocket into another galaxy"

    Reply
  21. Paul Anup says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:28 pm

    Concept of cold nuclear fusion rejected on non coherent detection of neutrons. Does strings theory also rejects it?

    Reply
  22. Spawn says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:29 pm

    Recreating a mini star on our planet sounds like a horrible idea…………

    Reply
  23. C4ofem317 Nasty says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:29 pm

    Sexy and smart u go girl

    Reply
  24. Hermes Trismegistus says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:29 pm

    Everything begins with a thought

    Bravo to the UK !!!!!

    Reply
  25. Eric Hopper says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:30 pm

    Fusion is also uses 'fossil fuels' for my personal definition, which is fuel that can't be replaced. It uses the fuel from a fossil universe. 🙂 But, of course, so does every other source of energy, ultimately. Entropy, you can't escape it. But, yeah, fusion would be really good. I still think we should consider fission (fuel from fossil stars) until fusion is viable.

    BTW, solar doesn't use fossil fuels because the sun would shine whether or not we collected the energy. We aren't using up hydrogen in order to produce energy. Something else is already using up gobs of hydrogen, and we're just collecting the energy that would otherwise go to waste.

    Reply
  26. Alexander Mester says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    "Fusion power is just around the corner." – A physicist from the 30s
    . Recoloured.

    Reply
  27. Vadim Bolshakov says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    solar roadways all the way

    Reply
  28. laronda10 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:38 pm

    Y'all fact check yourself? We have put out a positive energy yield just not a consistent yield that's worth slamming into a generator

    Reply
  29. nujabeslistener says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:39 pm

    Do you know ITER – Latin Knuckles!

    Reply
  30. Mariano Alippi says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:43 pm

    3D visualization with atractive voice women narrators es really inspiring, but i think that Seeker has to find the way to go to full doucmentries, and much more get into educacion and the WebGl or Unity could be perfect.

    Reply
  31. chadi badi says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:51 pm

    british people are so smart

    Reply
  32. Eman M says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:51 pm

    The uk is years behind

    Reply
  33. Veritas B. says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:54 pm

    2040 ? really? so not happening in my lifetime then?

    Reply
  34. Michael Brown says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:55 pm

    Given the history of fusion, this seems like a colossal waste of money to make a new tokamak from scratch.

    Reply
  35. Amit Kumar says:
    November 20, 2019 at 5:56 pm

    In 2100, UK will be building a prototype that'll active by 2120. This time for sure….

    Reply
  36. Michael Frazier says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:00 pm

    Where is my Trace Dominguez? I miss him… Much love too Maren Hunsberger I love you too.

    Reply
  37. Mojo NL says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:04 pm

    Call me a pessimist, but I don't think the UK can do this. I dont think it will be reached for just 220M. I dont think fusion is possible in 20 years.

    Reply
  38. wayne mcclory says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:05 pm

    When we start to mass produce the new Solid State battery 🔋 we will be able to get by on solar wind and hydro.

    Reply
  39. Tom Space says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:06 pm

    Search YouTube for "The ELEMENTS in six dimensions, arranged by volume periods of nuclide mass averages"

    Reply
  40. MrPotates says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:17 pm

    At least Boris managed to do something. But if this doesn't work there's Thorium based molten salt reactors, too bad it's going to be very diffucult to get people to accept them.

    Reply
  41. B May says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:21 pm

    Fusion power solves not just our energy issues, but the fresh water supply problems too! I think we'll have viable fusion power in the next 30 years, I just hope the climate doesn't keep us from making it that far.

    Reply
  42. Kankan Kalita says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:27 pm

    In short Spiderman 2

    Reply
  43. Divergent Evolution says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:48 pm

    China already has one almost done, so they are going to lose that race.

    Reply
  44. charlespk2008 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:51 pm

    meanwhile
    nuclear power/thorium-power/solar-satellites/hydro-kinetic-turbines: am i a joke to you?
    …
    but no really, other nuclear options are available already. there is no need to reinvent the wheel. they are on the coast, with stupid strong water currents just off shore of there major cities……why not place the wind-turbines….underwater? people are trying it.

    Reply
  45. RB says:
    November 20, 2019 at 6:54 pm

    Smart chicks are hot. 👍🖖😎

    Reply
  46. hicham mohsen says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:02 pm

    The Safire project already achieved fusion. Do an episode on that.

    Reply
  47. Smartphone Phone says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:15 pm

    UK can't do it!
    It is an international project!

    Reply
  48. Hee Sing Sia says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:28 pm

    Did the U.K. Sign goku and vegeta from Japan?

    Reply
  49. abe klassen says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:35 pm

    Hopes and dreams this has been a dream for decades . The dreamers will now believe it’s a hope . But that’s all dreams are . Dreaming of something that they can do which only god has created. Dreamers have only dreams to give them the answers to do this and dreams are also nightmares that dreamers thank god it was only a dream.

    Reply
  50. No Name says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:36 pm

    Your Giggling Boobies are driving me crazy!

    Reply
  51. sdfkjgh says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:42 pm

    1:29 I guess they kno de wae.

    Reply
  52. sdfkjgh says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:48 pm

    In all seriousness, though, I just had a thought.  What if the reason we haven't been able to make fusion work for us is that we've been working on too small of a scale?  How big are the smallest stars?  What if the only way to make sustainable fusion energy production work is to match or exceed those smallest stars' dimensions?

    Reply
  53. Justin says:
    November 20, 2019 at 7:49 pm

    I have a dream of a day when an article about fusion doesn't begin with a description of what fusion is.

    Reply
  54. Mariano Alippi says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:01 pm

    This web technology can not only serve for marketing and sales, but also for the testing of such complex physics topics that Maren is describing https://carvisualizer.plus360degrees.com/threejs/

    Reply
  55. Philippe Rubbers says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:09 pm

    If we can make fusion on earth as efficiently as the sun, what wattage is possible? I mean ideal conditions?
    Sun energy is 3000W/sqm.
    Divide by solar volume, and we have less energy per cubic meter than a compost heap…. And we are going to have to therefore be 100* more effective than the sun?
    Stop this nonsense, let's build a warp drive.

    Reply
  56. MindinViolet says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:15 pm

    It seems bold to build a fusion power plant when they don't know if it's even going to work. Good on them, though. Innovation has to start somewhere.

    Reply
  57. Mike says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:18 pm

    Sorry folks. Gonna take 50+ years. Don't hold your breath

    Reply
  58. Niklas Schmidt says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:24 pm

    2040 will be lit. Fusion and a Mars Colony? Hope we don't f-up a lot until then.

    Reply
  59. cmilkau says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:40 pm

    That was a lot of context and very little news. Details about what "slightly smaller doughnut" means and why that would be advantageous would have been more interesting than all the non-news about ITER. After all, it's a science channel, is it not? 😉

    Reply
  60. Martin Weltchek says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:42 pm

    To bad we can't create a biological magma monster that we can just keep it alive to create steam power! 😉

    Reply
  61. Ofsmoke Andfire says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:45 pm

    Why not do a show about the other fusion devices. Some developed by Boeing, Darpa, Northrop, and MIT. Do a story about the reactor started by laser beams & xray beams.

    Reply
  62. Rick James says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:48 pm

    So is China. So is Japan. They should race to this babe's tight asshole.

    Reply
  63. unidentified says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:50 pm

    Sorry, but I think that fusion energy won't be available in near future.

    Reply
  64. Gyasi Siaw says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:50 pm

    Legend has it, it's still 30 years away

    Reply
  65. thorium222 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:52 pm

    We already have an extremely reliable, maintenance free fusion reactor that delivers basically limitless energy for free, just saying.

    Reply
  66. Ry Ry The Science Guy says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:54 pm

    I suppose the lesson here is that if you throw enough money at something it will work

    Reply
  67. shanu singh says:
    November 20, 2019 at 8:57 pm

    Can I date her

    Reply
  68. Enthused says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:00 pm

    Let's not blow this out of proportion lol. The future of humanity is not in any way threatened by an inability to create electricity. Only the future of convenience and various types of machine-work is threatened. Mankind wasn't exactly on the brink of extinction before the 1800s just because they didn't have a power source for machines to do work for us.

    Reply
  69. Andrew Steele. says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:01 pm

    Really disappointing to see Seeker uncritically rehashing propaganda from the UK government… Here's a Twitter thread I wrote about why this is absolutely absurd: https://twitter.com/statto/status/1178604493358977024 It’s great to big up fusion at any opportunity, but please consult some experts before doing politicians’ PR for them!

    Reply
  70. goober says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:04 pm

    FFS!… America take note, it's called THE UK, not just UK … Jesus how hard is it?

    Reply
  71. goober says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:07 pm

    Tokamak energy's roadmap is actually grid ready power with the ST-E1 by 2030… Get it right will ya

    Reply
  72. kjetil Bergesen says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:30 pm

    Sounds Safe.

    Reply
  73. Dee B says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:32 pm

    Oil Companies: wait! Thats illegal!

    Reply
  74. Crazy eyes C.S says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:36 pm

    It's about time the British finger it out !! ..

    Reply
  75. Roy Porter Jr. says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:41 pm

    Extremely well done and very informative but…
    Very misleading headlines to get YouTube hits.
    Seems more like "Back to the Future".
    I give a dislike (and unsubscribe if subscribed) for ANY and ALL DIShonest (They be DIS-ing us) or misleading headlines on YouTube.
    Make the world (more) honest again!

    Uk built the first Fusion Power Plant in 2020? (Maybe)
    Zephron Cochran flew the first warp drive ship in April 5, 2063.
    In the year 2525, if mankind is still alive….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKQfxi8V5FA&list=RDzKQfxi8V5FA&start_radio=1&t=74

    Reply
  76. W. Lichmaster says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:43 pm

    I'm sure in 2040 the commercialisation is gonna be 'just around the corner and fully ready by 2060'

    Reply
  77. Da ve says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:48 pm

    They full of shit …..look at the mess 😂
    Ball of wire shit 😂😂😂
    What happens if theres to much energy 😭😂

    Reply
  78. Mike Watman says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:51 pm

    Reactor: Not today Satan

    Hydrogen: Party

    Reply
  79. Jonas Hamill says:
    November 20, 2019 at 9:51 pm

    she said the B word 😳

    Reply
  80. Potato Powered Hamster says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:27 pm

    "Alexa, set timer for 20 years."
    In 20 years time… "Alexa, OH NEVERMIND"

    Reply
  81. Swift says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:30 pm

    Does this mean in theory one day (many many lifetimes from now) we may be able to create artificial stars to sustain life?

    Reply
  82. Patrick Milewski says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:31 pm

    Failure, I smell it in this one.

    Reply
  83. roadkill serna says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:33 pm

    Ugh dont be so ignorant, they already have fusion reactors but wont release the info to the public. The best Example: usnavy patent for a compact fusion reactor….you cant have a patent if it doesnt Work.

    Reply
  84. Denonono Hardcore says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:35 pm

    How could you talk about fusion with out mentioning the SAFIRE project? https://www.safireproject.com/

    Reply
  85. The Power of Zen says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:35 pm

    Uk: we will have fusion by 2040
    Also Uk: Lets brexit and plunge our economy into the dark ages. We will be Lucky to afford coal.
    Scotland: FREEEEEDOMMM!!!! #indyrefdeux

    Reply
  86. colinvanful says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:39 pm

    tokamak's have been around for years they use enough power to run a small town , and run for less than a second !
    and still they have no idea what to do with the masses of heat produced , quite litraly too hot for anything we have to handle ,
    and if the uk thinks it might be twenty years ,it probably was a typo error they meant 200 years more like !

    Reply
  87. Steve Windsurf says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:43 pm

    Brexit will not impact UK involvement in ITER! The US is a contributor and it feels that taxation without representation is a bad idea!
    Ironically the UK could be in a better position to positively impact ITER outside the union.
    No valueless middle man!
    2040 – lol – predictions rely on thinking we will eventually know what we don’t know, based on historical progress, but clearly in this case we know that we don’t know when, we will know.

    Reply
  88. Satyavan says:
    November 20, 2019 at 10:55 pm

    Unclear what it makes different from iter.

    Reply
  89. [email protected] says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:05 pm

    US already has it, but don't want to release it to protect the Petro dollar.

    Reply
  90. storminmormin14 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:09 pm

    This is gonna look like a ridiculously expensive waste of money by the time they light it up. MITs ARC reactor is already much more promising. Yes they have scale but with the rapid improvement in super conductor tech, there won’t be any reason to build these giant reactors.

    Reply
  91. DemistTheLies says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:14 pm

    That first shot over city was Shanghai. Over my home in Xuhui district. Haha

    Reply
  92. SeldonLien says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:15 pm

    We don't need fusion energy in a world that provides us with girls like her with so much fat to burn. This is renewable. Burning witches provides a good amount of heat.

    Reply
  93. SeldonLien says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:18 pm

    You can skip the first 3 boring minutes guys. Just a big intro to fill the void.

    Reply
  94. Mimo Slavich says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:23 pm

    Many of the nations involed in ITER are not EU nations, but somehow the UK leaving the EU means it cannot participate….

    Reply
  95. Martijn van Gorp says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:23 pm

    Maren, please make a video on fusion in 20 years?

    Reply
  96. CosmeFulanito476 says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:24 pm

    I NEED TRITIUM SPIDERMAN!

    Reply
  97. casthelion says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:25 pm

    2040… still, nuclear fusion is 20 years away, just like it always has

    Reply
  98. Prometheus says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:27 pm

    The presenters passion is contagious

    Reply
  99. YAH YEL says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:31 pm

    we have free energy devices, but they are being suppressed! we need to demand from ourselves the release of those technologies now.

    Reply
  100. Anonymous bub says:
    November 20, 2019 at 11:50 pm

    So theoretically if we could get fusion to work then we could fuse all the way down to iron, then having an informant amount of iron.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • HOW TO: OLYMPIC GYMNASTICS WARM UP ROUTINE
  • Top 5 CHIPPING MISTAKES And How To STOP THEM! | ME AND MY GOLF
  • How Games Do Health | Game Maker’s Toolkit
  • North Korean athletes under 24-hour watch at Olympics
  • 2:05 Olympic Distance Triathlon
  • Fixie Vs Geared: Which Bike Is Fastest For City Riding?
  • The Most EPIC Cycling Saves Of The 2019 Pro Racing Season So Far…
  • Volkswagen Golf Plus 1.2 TSI 105pk BlueMotion Technology Trendline
  • Volkswagen Golf 1.4 TSI GT Sport Climat/170 PK!
  • 8 Cycling Mistakes We All Make

Recent Comments

  • Up To Scratch Golf on Top 5 CHIPPING MISTAKES And How To STOP THEM! | ME AND MY GOLF
  • Neville Coleske on Top 5 CHIPPING MISTAKES And How To STOP THEM! | ME AND MY GOLF
  • Alejandro Garcia Ruiz on Fixie Vs Geared: Which Bike Is Fastest For City Riding?
  • Schrombges on Top 5 CHIPPING MISTAKES And How To STOP THEM! | ME AND MY GOLF
  • Joe Smith on How Games Do Health | Game Maker’s Toolkit

Tags

and Athletics basketball club college comedy Cycling education Fitness football for funny game games gaming golf golf club golf course golfing golf instruction golf swing golf tips how to its News Olympics pga pga tour Recreation review soccer sport sports tennis that the this tips tutorial university video was you your yt:cc=on
©2019 Paul Casey | All rights reserved.